Abrahamic / Middle Eastern Christianity Deuteronomist Theology and Blaming the Victims Share Flipboard Email Print AHPhotoswpg/Getty Images Christianity The Old Testament Christianity Origins The Bible The New Testament Practical Tools for Christians Christian Life For Teens Christian Prayers Weddings Inspirational Bible Devotions Denominations of Christianity Funerals and Memorial Services Christian Holidays Christian Entertainment Key Terms in Christianity Catholicism Latter Day Saints View More By Austin Cline Atheism Expert M.A., Princeton University B.A., University of Pennsylvania Austin Cline, a former regional director for the Council for Secular Humanism, writes and lectures extensively about atheism and agnosticism. our editorial process Austin Cline Updated February 03, 2019 The idea of Deuteronomist Theology is used more in academic discussions about the Bible, but it can be necessary for understanding modern politics and religion in America, too. Many of the principles of Deuteronomist Theology are also theological assumptions taken for granted by conservative Christians today. Thus understanding conservative Christian politics requires some understanding of their Deuteronomist assumptions. What Is Deuteronomist Theology and Politics? Deuteronomist Theology refers, in its original and basic sense, to the theological agenda of the Deuteronomist editor or editors who worked on the Book of Deuteronomy as well as the books of the Deuteronomist History: Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings. It is this theological agenda which has helped scholars today recognize the influence of a particular editor or editorial school in many different books of the Old Testament. The theology and politics of the Deuteronomist can be summarized with these principles: Israel must be united under theocratic ruleYahweh alone is sovereignYahweh alone should be worshippedWorship must be centralized in the Temple in JerusalemThe Israelites are Yahweh's chosen peopleYahweh has a special concern for widows, orphans, and the poorAll Israelites are brothers and sisters and must answer for how they treat each otherOutsiders must be exterminated through war and conquestThe Israelites are granted ownership and control over all of CanaanThere is a formal covenant or treaty between Yahweh and the IsraelitesThe Book of Deuteronomy lays out the details of this covenantThe covenant is supreme above all else, including any kings and aristocratsProphets and Priests are Yahweh's representatives and guardians of the covenantYahweh is obligated to provide blessings to the Israelites on condition of obedienceThe Israelites are obligated to obey and submit to Yahweh. Otherwise, they will be cursed Origins of Deuteronomist Theology The core of the Deuteronomist Theology can be reduced even further to a core principle: Yahweh will bless those who obey and punish those who disobey. In practice, though, the principle is expressed in the reverse form: if you're suffering, then it must be because you disobeyed and if you're prospering it must be because you have been obedient. This is a harsh theology of retribution: what you sow, you will reap. This attitude can be found in multiple religions, and the origin can probably be found in the relationship ancient agricultural communities had with their natural environment. Although they had to deal with unexpected disasters (drought, flood), in general, there was a direct connection between work and results. People who do a good job and who are diligent will eat better than those who don't work well or who are lazy. Development of Deuteronomist Theology As reasonable as this may seem, it becomes a problem when it's generalized to all aspects of life, not just farming. The situation gets worse with the introduction of an aristocracy and centralized monarchy, exactly what is described as occurring throughout the Deuteronomic writings. The aristocracy and monarchial court don't work the land and don't produce food, clothing, tools, or anything else like that but they do extract value from the work of others. Some, therefore, end up eating well no matter what they do while those who do work hard may not eat well because of how much they must turn over in taxes. The aristocracy benefits greatly from the reversed version of the above principle: if you are prosperous, it's a sign that Yahweh has blessed you because you've been obedient. Because of their ability to extract wealth from others through taxes, the aristocracy is always doing (relatively) well. It is in their interests that the principle stops being "what you sow, you will reap" and instead becomes "whatever you are reaping, you must have sown." Deuteronomist Theology Today—Blaming the Victim It's not hard at all to find statements and ideas today influenced this Deuteronomist Theology. There are so many examples of people blaming victims for their misfortune. Merely blaming the victim, though, isn't the same as Deuteronomist Theology—it would be more accurate to say that the latter is a particular manifestation of the former. Two key elements allow us to characterize something as being influenced by the principles of Deuteronomist Theology. First and most important is the involvement of God. Thus saying that AIDS is a punishment from God for homosexuality is Deuteronomist; saying that a woman was raped because she wore revealing clothing is not. In Deuteronomist Theology both prosperity and suffering are ultimately attributed to God. The second element is the idea that one has a covenant with God which obligates a person to obey God's laws. Sometimes this element is obvious, as when American preachers claim that America has a special relationship with God and that's why Americans suffer when they fail to obey God's laws. Sometimes, though, this element seems to be missing as when floods in Asia are attributed to God's wrath. In some cases, the person may be assuming that everyone is obligated to follow God's laws and a "covenant" is implied. Deuteronomist Theology as Flawed Morality The key flaw in Deuteronomist Theology, aside perhaps from the propensity to blame the victim, is the inability to deal with structural problems—problems in the structures of social systems or organization which produce or merely reinforce inequality and injustice. If its origin does indeed lie with less rigid and less hierarchical systems of ancient agricultural communities, then its failure to meet the demands of our modern complex social structures is hardly surprising. It's also no surprise that the use of Deuteronomist Theology is most common among those who are the least affected by structural injustices. They are the ones who tend to be the most privileged and who identify the most with the ruling classes. If they acknowledge that there are any problems at all, the source of the problem is always with individual behavior because suffering is always a consequence of God withholding blessings from the disobedient. It's never a consequence of flaws in the system—a system the modern "priests" (self-professed representatives of God) benefit from.