Knowing the Difference Between Contingent vs. Necessary Truths

close up of cat's claw

AnasiZ/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain

The distinction between contingent and necessary statements is one of the oldest in philosophy. Truth is necessary if denying it would entail a contradiction. A truth is contingent, however, if it happens to be true but could have been false.

Example

Cats are mammals.
Cats are reptiles.
Cats have claws.

The first statement is a necessary truth because denying it, as with the second statement, results in a contradiction. Cats are, by definition, mammals, so saying that they are reptiles is a contradiction. The third statement is a contingent truth because it is possible that cats could have evolved without claws.

This is similar to the distinction between essential and accidental qualities. Being a mammal is part of a cat's essence, but having claws is an accident.

Format
mla apa chicago
Your Citation
Cline, Austin. "Knowing the Difference Between Contingent vs. Necessary Truths." Learn Religions, Aug. 26, 2020, learnreligions.com/contingent-vs-necessary-truths-4079977. Cline, Austin. (2020, August 26). Knowing the Difference Between Contingent vs. Necessary Truths. Retrieved from https://www.learnreligions.com/contingent-vs-necessary-truths-4079977 Cline, Austin. "Knowing the Difference Between Contingent vs. Necessary Truths." Learn Religions. https://www.learnreligions.com/contingent-vs-necessary-truths-4079977 (accessed July 28, 2021).